1.7.5: Occasional failure of CreatePipe or signal handing due to thread-unsafe code in cwdstuff::set
Corinna Vinschen
corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com
Thu Aug 12 16:07:00 GMT 2010
On Aug 12 11:51, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 04:48:48PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Aug 12 16:38, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> On Aug 12 10:12, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> > I've done some googling but I can't find an answer to this: Is it
> >> > possible to create a directory which can't be written to - even by a
> >> > privileged user?
> >>
> >> No. I never came across a directory which is not writable under
> >> SE_BACKUP_NAME conditions.
> >
> >What if we create a subdirectory like C:/cygwin/.for_win32_only
> >for exactly this one single purpose, to redirect any relative
> >Win32 calls there?
>
> I guess that would be an acceptable compromise if the below doesn't past
> muster:
>
> On XP, at least, we could set the current directory to '//?/PIPE'.
> That causes CreateFile to fail. I used the program below to test
> that.
>
> sh-3.2$ ./setdir '//?/PIPE'
> SetCurrentDirectory succeeded
> CreateFile failed, 123
>
> I'll try that on other systems to see if it still behaves predictably.
Works fine on W7 if you specify \\?\PIPE\, with the trailing backslash.
Without trailing backslash it fails:
$ ./setdir '\\?\PIPE'
SetCurrentDirectory faile, 123
$ ./setdir '\\?\PIPE\'
CreateFile failed, 2
That sounds like a neat solution. I would never have expected that
SetCurrentDirectory works for the pipe FS.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
More information about the Cygwin-developers
mailing list