nanosleep() patch
Corinna Vinschen
cygwin-patches@cygwin.com
Tue Jan 21 15:58:00 GMT 2003
Hi Jason,
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 02:28:53PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> Attached is a patch that implements nanosleep() by attempting to
> reuse the current sleep() implementation which seems to provide the
> necessary functionality.
>
> I'm not sure if there is a better way to convey the fact that
> sleep_worker() was interrupted than my current implementation.
> Comments on this issue and the patch in general are welcome.
I'm wondering if we could do without an extra function sleep_worker()
and let nanosleep() be the basic implementation. So sleep() as well
as usleep() could call nanosleep(). Isn't that done that way in the
Linux kernel, too?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the Cygwin-patches
mailing list