Next major Cygwin version?

[Christopher Faylor]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 08:28:00PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>[snip]
>>>which would explain why that number was skipped.  However, I also know
>>>that CVS has a fondness for odd version numbers, and likes to reserve
>>>the even ones for some usage that I can't remember.
>>
>>The even numbers are reserved by the government.  They maintain hidden
>>branches for their experiments in mind-control-through-cygwin.  I guess
>>the experiments have been successful, if you're claiming never to have
>>seen a cygwin version 1.6.x.
>
>Not on an open line Faylor! You'll blow the whole deal!

Uh oh.  Doh.  I'm preparing a new 1.6.47 release now.  That should fix
things.

Please inspect this release *very* closely.  The new version of
setup.exe has some...  interesting...  graphics...

cgf