GPLv3

Dave Korn dave.korn@artimi.com
Thu Jul 5 14:58:00 GMT 2007


On 05 July 2007 15:41, Eric Blake wrote:

> According to Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) on 7/5/2007 7:16 AM:

>> Hmm, I wonder what a lawyer might be able to make out of
>> item 5 (No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups) wrt
>> GPLv3. It shouldn't be hard to convince those uneducated,
>> uninformed, layman juries that they're discriminating
>> against DRM providers' lawyers. :-)
> 
> Wouldn't you know it - that is actually one of the REAL objections being
> mentioned on the OSI mailing list?
>
http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:12905:200706:nifbaainbjiiahpeank
h
> 
> Fortunately, a counterargument was also given:
> 
>> This could also be a OSD #5/6 issue, because it
>> completely blocks use by certain parties.  However,
>> the conveyor can only be restricted if they agree to
>> a particular patent deal (something that is not
>> guaranteed by OSD) in relation to GPLv3 software.
>> Deals solely for unrelated software won't affect
>> their rights.


  Yes, it would be a nonsense.  DRM laywers' are in no way excluded from the
GPL, they are welcome to it in the exact same terms as absolutely everyone
else, so they aren't being discriminated against.  The only group who is being
excluded is "people who breach the gpl".



    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....



More information about the Cygwin-talk mailing list